ALG's Jim Eisenmann Appears on 60 Minutes to Discuss the MSPB
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Alden Law Group, PLLC

Washington, DC Federal Employment + Labor Attorneys

  • About Us
  • What We Do
    • Employment Contracts
    • Employees’ Workplace Obligations
    • Discrimination & Harassment
    • Federal Employees
    • Security Clearances
    • D.C. Employees
    • Leaves of Absences
    • Privacy
    • Virginia Employees
    • Wage & Hour
    • Whistleblowing
    • Wrongful Discharge
    • Human Resources & Advice for Employers
  • Who We Are
    • Kristin D. Alden
    • Wynter P. Allen
    • Michelle F. Bercovici
    • James Eisenmann
    • Ross E. Fishbein
    • Dominick Schumacher
    • Abbey Taylor
    • Philip A. Mueller
  • Media
  • Resources
    • Notable Cases
    • Testimonials
    • About Consultations
    • FAQs
  • Contact
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Federal Employees

Home / Practice Areas / Federal Employees / Congressional Accountability Act

Congressional Accountability Act

The Congressional Accountability Act (CAA) extends coverage of several federal labor and employment protections to over 30,000 employees of the legislative branch, including employees of the House of Representatives, the Senate, and the Architect of the Capitol. The CAA applies thirteen civil rights, labor, and workplace safety laws to legislative branch employees, including: OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970); Federal Labor Relations Act; federal laws prohibiting discrimination and harassment based on race, sex, color, national origin, disability, pregnancy, genetic discrimination, and age; federal laws prohibiting discrimination based on military service or veterans’ status; federal overtime pay laws under the Fair Labor Standards Act; and the right to family medical leave under the Family Medical Leave Act. The CAA does not extend protections for whistleblower reprisal to legislative branch employees. However, employees may still be able to bring claims if they have been retaliated against for activity protected under other provisions of the CAA, such as reporting a health and safety violation, raising a claim of discrimination, objecting to sexual harassment, requesting accommodations for disabilities, or requesting or taking FMLA leave.

The Congressional Office of Compliance (OOC) is an independent office charged with administering and enforcing the CAA. In order to pursue a claim under many of the provisions of the CAA, including claims of discrimination or harassment, employees must go through a mandatory multi-stage dispute resolution process through the Office of Compliance. Employees do have the right to designate a representative at any time during the process. The procedures for pursuing claims under the CAA can often be convoluted and confusing.

In general, legislative branch employees must initiate a claim under the CAA by filing a written request for counseling with the OOC within 180 days of the violation. The OOC will then conduct a formal 30-day counseling period, where an OOC counselor will discuss the claim and inform the employee of rights under the law. It is important that during the counseling phase, the employee or applicant identify each event and action the agency took which was discriminatory or retaliatory.

If the employee wants to continue with his or her claim after the end of the counseling period, the next stage in complaint processing is a mandatory 30-day mediation period. The complainant must file a written request for mediation within 15 calendar days of receiving notification that the counseling period has ended. The complainant must ensure that the OOC receives the written request on or before the 15th day, before 5:00p.m. Eastern Time. A complainant should file in such a way that he or she can prove timely filing, for example, by hand-delivering the claim and obtaining a copy of the claim stamped as received by the OOC, by certified mail, or via fax with the fax confirmation. In mediation, the OOC will appoint a mediator to meet with the parties, either together or separately, to explore the issues and potential resolutions. While participation in mediation is mandatory under the CAA, mediated settlements are always voluntary – a mediator cannot require either party to agree to a settlement nor can a mediator issue a decision.

If mediation is unsuccessful, a complainant has ninety days to elect one of two options for pursing their claim: requesting an administrative hearing before a hearing officer or filing a law suit in federal district court.

  • Hearing before a hearing officer. Under this path, the complainant will file a formal complaint and the OOC will appoint a neutral hearing officer. The complainant can be represented by an attorney, request to engage in discovery (e.g., demand documents, data and evidence and can force federal employees to participate depositions), and present evidence and testimony at a hearing. The process moves relatively swiftly – a hearing officer will normally open a hearing within 60 days after a complaint is filed and will issue a decision within 90 days after a hearing is complete. The hearing officer will issue a decision on whether the employing office discriminated or retaliated against the complainant and, if so, what relief is appropriate. Once the hearing officer issues a decision, either the complainant or the employing office has 30 days to appeal the decision to the Board of Directors of the OOC. The Board’s review is limited and does not include reweighing of the evidence or making factual findings. If the employee or employing office is not satisfied with the Board’s decision, they can file a limited appeal with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
  • Federal court law suit. The other option is to file a complaint in federal court. In most cases the complainant may demand a jury trial. Once a complainant chooses to pursue his or her claims in court, she or he may no longer seek a hearing before a hearing officer. The relief available in court is the same as the relief available through a hearing examiner.

Our attorneys have invaluable experience representing legislative branch employees and unions in claims under the CAA, including claims involving discrimination, sexual harassment, overtime pay, FMLA violations, failures to accommodate, unequal pay, arbitrations under Collective Bargaining Agreements, and health and safety violations.

Our goal is to ensure that you have the information you need to make effective, well-informed decisions about how to protect and enforce your rights. We can talk with you about your unique situation and evaluate whether you have a viable claim under the CAA. We can recommend strategies for presenting the most important evidence. We will evaluate the value of your case and what you might recover if you are successful in your claims. Our attorneys are committed to giving you information and tools to make a strong case and smart decisions.

If you are a legislative branch employee and think you have been discriminated against by your employing office, contact us.

Primary Sidebar

PRACTICE AREAS

  • Employment Contracts
    • Executive Employment Agreements
    • Non-Compete Agreements
    • Non-Solicitation Agreements
    • Separation Agreements
  • Employees’ Workplace Obligations
    • Trade Secrets, Duty of Loyalty
  • Discrimination & Harassment
    • Sex
    • LGBTQ + Gender Identity
    • Family Responsibility
    • National Origin
    • Religion
    • Disability and Requests for Accommodations
    • HIV Status
    • Age Discrimination
    • Hostile work environment & Harassment
    • Pay Discrimination, Equal Pay Act
    • Pregnancy & Breastfeeding
    • Retaliation
  • Federal Employees
    • Congressional Accountability Act
    • Discrimination in Federal Sector
    • Discipline and Other Adverse Actions in Federal Sector
    • Foreign Service Officers
    • Government Ethics
    • Agency Internal Grievance Systems
    • Intelligence Community
    • Federal Sector Labor Unions
    • Law Enforcement in Federal Sector
    • Inspector General and OPR Investigations
    • Union Grievances in Federal Sector
    • VERA/VSIP
    • Whistleblowing in Federal Sector
  • Security Clearances
  • D.C. Employees
    • Office of Employee Appeals
    • D.C. Employees Discrimination Complaints
    • Union Grievance Processes
    • D.C. Government Whistleblowing Rights
  • Leaves of Absences
    • Family Medical Leave Act
    • Uniformed Service Members
    • District of Columbia Leave Laws
  • Privacy
    • Medical Inquires
    • FOIA
    • Privacy Act
    • Medical Records
  • Virginia Employees
    • Virginia State Grievance Process
    • Virginia County Grievance Process
    • Virginia State Employee Whistleblowing Rights
  • Wage & Hour
    • Federal Fair Labor Standards Act
    • Wage and Hour in D.C., Maryland and Virginia
  • Whistleblowing
    • Federal Employees
    • Sarbanes-Oxley & SEC Whistleblowing
    • Federal Government Contractors
    • Equal Employment Opportunity Retaliation
    • The Occupational Safety and Health Whistleblowers Laws
    • D.C. Government Whistleblowing Rights
    • Virginia State Employee Whistleblowing Rights
  • Wrongful Discharge
  • Human Resources & Advice for Employers
    • Employee Handbooks
    • Hiring & Firing
    • Management Investigations
    • Workplace Training
Best Lawyers Award Badge
2020 Top Lawyers - Northern Virginia Magazine
Top Lawyer 2020 - Washingtonian

Want to schedule an appointment?

LET’S CONNECT

Footer

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Contact Us

1850 M Street, NW
Suite 901
Washington. DC 20036

(855) 463-0300
(202) 463-0300
(855) 463-0301 (fax)
(202) 463-0301 (fax)

Our Team

  • Kristin D. Alden
  • Wynter P. Allen
  • Michelle F. Bercovici
  • James Eisenmann
  • Ross E. Fishbein
  • Dominick Schumacher
  • Abbey Taylor
  • Philip A. Mueller

Practice Areas

  • Employment Contracts
    • Executive Employment Agreements
    • Non-Compete Agreements
    • Non-Solicitation Agreements
    • Separation Agreements
  • Employees’ Workplace Obligations
    • Trade Secrets, Duty of Loyalty
  • Discrimination & Harassment
    • Sex
    • LGBTQ + Gender Identity
    • Family Responsibility
    • National Origin
    • Religion
    • Disability and Requests for Accommodations
    • HIV Status
    • Age Discrimination
    • Hostile work environment & Harassment
    • Pay Discrimination, Equal Pay Act
    • Pregnancy & Breastfeeding
    • Retaliation
  • Federal Employees
    • Congressional Accountability Act
    • Discrimination in Federal Sector
    • Discipline and Other Adverse Actions in Federal Sector
    • Foreign Service Officers
    • Government Ethics
    • Agency Internal Grievance Systems
    • Intelligence Community
    • Federal Sector Labor Unions
    • Law Enforcement in Federal Sector
    • Inspector General and OPR Investigations
    • Union Grievances in Federal Sector
    • VERA/VSIP
    • Whistleblowing in Federal Sector
  • Security Clearances
  • D.C. Employees
    • Office of Employee Appeals
    • D.C. Employees Discrimination Complaints
    • Union Grievance Processes
    • D.C. Government Whistleblowing Rights
  • Leaves of Absences
    • Family Medical Leave Act
    • Uniformed Service Members
    • District of Columbia Leave Laws
  • Privacy
    • Medical Inquires
    • FOIA
    • Privacy Act
    • Medical Records
  • Virginia Employees
    • Virginia State Grievance Process
    • Virginia County Grievance Process
    • Virginia State Employee Whistleblowing Rights
  • Wage & Hour
    • Federal Fair Labor Standards Act
    • Wage and Hour in D.C., Maryland and Virginia
  • Whistleblowing
    • Federal Employees
    • Sarbanes-Oxley & SEC Whistleblowing
    • Federal Government Contractors
    • Equal Employment Opportunity Retaliation
    • The Occupational Safety and Health Whistleblowers Laws
    • D.C. Government Whistleblowing Rights
    • Virginia State Employee Whistleblowing Rights
  • Wrongful Discharge
  • Human Resources & Advice for Employers
    • Employee Handbooks
    • Hiring & Firing
    • Management Investigations
    • Workplace Training

Ready to Go?

    Disclaimer: While we are happy to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail or fax, merely contacting the Alden Law Group, PLLC or any Alden Law Group, PLLC attorney does not create an attorney-client relationship until a written agreement has been reached between you and the firm to handle a particular matter. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires us to do several things, including resolution of possible conflicts of interest and executing an appropriate fee arrangement and mutual agreement identifying the terms of the engagement. Although any information we receive will be considered confidential and private, do not send us any information you regard as confidential until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Any information you convey to the Alden Law Group, PLLC via the Internet may not be secure, and information conveyed prior to establishing an attorney-client relationship may not be privileged.

    © 2021 Alden Law Group, PLLC. All rights reserved. Site by Midwest New Media, LLC.  •  Terms of Use